Bankrupt

Sign up to mark as complete Sign up to bookmark this question
Asset Pricingx / 34
Behavioral Questionsx / 7
Brain Teasersx / 70
Derivatives Theoryx / 104
Digital Assets - Cryptox / 64
Energy Tradingx / 40
Linear Algebrax / 24
Math Questionsx / 26
Probability and Statistics Theoryx / 120
Programmingx / 34
Totalx / 524

Sign up to track your progress

Bankrupt

Two players, A and B, play a game in which the winner receives 1 dollar from the other player. Player A has 1 dollar and player B has 2 dollars. Player A is better in this game and wins 2/3 of the games. They play until one of them is bankrupt.

What is the probability that player A wins?
Take a look at the lesson about Markov Chain Probability (Probability).
This is a pretty straightforwards Markov chain problem. There are 4 states. The transition graph is given in Figure 1.

Figure 1 - Transition graph for this problem.


The problem starts at state 1. As has been explained in the lessons of this course, we use the following equation:

(1)  

(2)  

Furthermore, and . Then we have

(3)  

(4)  

Solving these equation gives us and . So, starting with 1 dollar, player A has a 4/7 chance of winning.

Proof
If we substitute Equation 4 in Equation 3, we have

(5)  

(6)  

 

(7)  

 

(8)  

Title Category Subcategory Difficulty Status
Animal Migations Probability and Statistics TheoryMarkov Chain ProbabilityEasy
Coin Series #1 Probability and Statistics TheoryMarkov Chain ProbabilityEasy
Coin Series #2 Probability and Statistics TheoryMarkov Chain ProbabilityMedium
Coin Series #3 Probability and Statistics TheoryMarkov Chain ProbabilityHard
Dominant Game Probability and Statistics TheoryMarkov Chain ProbabilityMedium
Jumping Toad Probability and Statistics TheoryMarkov Chain ProbabilityMedium
Random Ant Probability and Statistics TheoryMarkov Chain ProbabilityMedium
Example
The Drunkard's Walk Probability and Statistics TheoryMarkov Chain ProbabilityHard
Top 2000 Songs Probability and Statistics TheoryMarkov Chain ProbabilityMedium

Please log in to see the discussion.